Advice for enduring guardians appointed before 1 September 2015 under an enduring power of guardianship
Anyone appointed as an enduring guardian (or alternative guardian) under an enduring power of guardianship signs a statement of acceptance. In their statement of acceptance, they will have undertaken to exercise the powers conferred honestly and in accordance with the provisions of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986.
The enduring guardian’s powers
An enduring guardian is able to make decisions on behalf of the person who appointed them for all:
- health care and
- lifestyle matters that they are empowered by the appointment form to make.
Usually the enduring guardian has decision-making power to:
- decide where the person is to live, whether permanently or temporarily
- decide who the person is to live with
- decide whether the person should be permitted to work
- consent to any health care that is in the best interests of the person
- restrict visitors to such extent as may be necessary in the best interests of the person.
The guardian needs to check the document appointing them to be sure of exactly what their powers are. The person who appointed them may have set specific limitations on the guardian’s powers in the document. The person who appointed the guardian may have also set out in the document any wishes they want the guardian to take into account when making decisions for them. The guardian should always consider these wishes and implement them wherever possible.
An enduring guardian cannot make financial decisions.
When the power starts
The enduring guardian’s powers only begin when the person who appointed them has lost capacity. An enduring guardian may seek advice from the person’s doctor if they are unsure whether the person has lost capacity. In some instances, the doctor may think a specialist report is required.
Capacity is understood as ‘decision making capacity’ as defined under the Powers of Attorney Act 2014.
Medical treatment decisions
If the enduring guardian is empowered to make health care decisions, the enduring guardian will be able to consent to medical or dental treatment on behalf of the person who appointed them (if the medical agent thinks it is in the best interests of patient to do so). Read about medical consent and refusal of medical treatment at the medical consent section of this website.
Medical agent’s decisions have priority
If the person who appointed the enduring guardian also appointed a medical agent under an enduring power of attorney (medical treatment), the medical agent’s decisions about medical and dental treatment will have priority over the enduring guardian’s decisions. If VCAT has appointed a guardian or a person to make medical treatment decisions, their decisions will also have priority over the enduring guardian’s decisions.
Health care that is not medical and dental treatment
Health care is a broad term and is not just about medical and dental treatment. The enduring guardian is responsible for consenting to health care that is not medical and dental treatment including:
- mobility exercises
- alternative therapies.
A medical agent is not able to consent to these forms of health care.
The enduring guardian’s responsibilities
The law requires that the enduring guardian:
- act in the best interests of the person who appointed them
- take into account their wishes and give effect to these wherever possible
- encourage them to participate in the life of the community
- protect them from abuse, neglect or exploitation
- advocate for them
- adopt the means which is the least restrictive of a person's freedom of decision and action as is possible in the circumstances.
If the enduring guardian has any conflict of interest or concern, they can ask VCAT for advice.
Financial implications of decisions
There will usually be financial implications of the decisions an enduring guardian makes. Enduring guardians need to ensure that the person who appointed them can afford those decisions. If there is a financial attorney or an administrator appointed, the enduring guardian should discuss their decisions with them to see what the person can afford.
When an enduring guardian and an attorney for financial matters disagree
Where an enduring guardian and an attorney appointed under an enduring power of attorney (financial), or an attorney for personal matters appointed under the new Powers of Attorney Act 2014 disagree about a matter where each has authority to act, the decision of the enduring guardian prevails to the extent of any inconsistency (unless otherwise ordered by VCAT).
This means the attorney must implement the decision.
However, where there is a disagreement either may also apply to VCAT to resolve the matter. And if the implementation of the decision would result in a serious depletion of the principal's financial resources, the attorney for financial matters must apply to VCAT to resolve the matter.
Keeping records of decisions
The enduring guardian should keep a record of any decisions they make, and the reasons why they chose to make them. It may be helpful for the enduring guardian to keep copies of correspondence, as well as a record of conversations they have with service providers. They may be useful if someone challenges a decision and claims the decision was not in the best interests of the person who appointed the enduring guardian.
Resignation of enduring guardian
If the enduring guardians no longer wishes to accept the appointment they should communicate this to the person who appointed them; then the person can make other arrangements if they wish. If the person who appointed them no longer has capacity to revoke (cancel) the enduring power of guardianship, then the enduring guardian should consider applying to VCAT to have the appointment revoked.
An enduring guardian can be ordered to pay compensation
If the enduring guardian contravenes (fails to properly undertake) their duties or obligations and this results in a loss to the principal, the enduring guardian may be ordered by VCAT or the Supreme Court to compensate the principal for the loss.
However, if VCAT or the Supreme Court considers that the enduring guardian acted honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excused for the contravention they can relieve the enduring guardian from all or part of their personal liability for the contravention. Also, if the enduring guardian acted in compliance with any advice, direction or order of VCAT or the Supreme Court (and the enduring guardian did not knowingly give false or misleading information to VCAT or the Supreme Court) they will not be liable.