OPA’s submission to the public consultation on this issue notes that this work is undermined by the lack of a national safeguarding framework for people with disability. A national framework would provide much needed clarity on the scope and safeguarding goals of CVS. Once a coherent framework is in place, the most appropriate CVS model and goals for a program of enhanced national consistency may be determined.

OPA’s submission notes that CVS all undertake a form of safeguarding that is characterised by proactive outreach (unscheduled visiting), but that the vast majority of current Australian CVS do proactive outreach to ‘risky settings’ as opposed to proactive outreach to a list of ‘at-risk’ individuals. OPA agrees that there is insufficient proactive outreach safeguarding available to ‘at-risk’ individuals more broadly but that achieving this would likely require a different model than that delivered by CVS. Shifting away from a ‘risky settings’ model would leave many people in supported accommodation unprotected from abuse. OPA recommends that CVS safeguarding models retain their current focus on ‘risky settings’ and seek national consistency at the level of principles to enable jurisdictions to continue tailor safeguarding to their unique contexts. OPA also highlights the value of CVS as part of a broader safeguarding framework which would be further promoted by better information sharing provisions with the National Disability Insurance Agency and the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission.

OPA made the following recommendations:

Recommendation 1

OPA recommends that a nationally consistent approach to CVS clearly define the type of safeguarding it aims to establish.

Recommendation 2

OPA recommends that CVS safeguarding models remain focused on ‘risky settings’ as opposed to starting with ‘at-risk individuals’.

Recommendation 3

OPA recommends the establishment of national principles to guide CVS practice in specific state and territory contexts.

Recommendation 4

OPA recommends that a national approach to CVS clearly delineate its role as separate yet complementary to regulatory functions.

Recommendation 5

OPA recommends that the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing engage with the National CVS Working Group to consider approaches to improving the NDIS Participant Safeguarding policy.

Recommendation 6

OPA recommends strengthening information sharing requirements between the National Disability Insurance Agency and the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission and CVS to enable CVS to obtain essential safeguarding information.

Recommendation 7

OPA recommends that CVS be appropriately resourced to provide effective service to undertake the role with diligence and care.